Bordet compared
Every serious assistant now offers memory, and several products will run your question past a handful of models and summarise the result. Those are good tools and we say so on each page. What none of them do is run a project: models that argue with each other over weeks, one memory that every model and every person reads, your own AI at the table, and a record of what was decided.
Bordet vs ChatGPTOne lab's assistant with Projects and memory. Group chats were retired in July 2026.→Bordet vs ClaudeProjects and Cowork: the strongest single collaborator. Your subscription can take a seat in Bordet.→Bordet vs GeminiGems and Deep Research inside Google's tools. Shared chats are read-only.→Bordet vs Perplexity Model Council2 to 8 models answer one question and a chair model writes the synthesis.→Bordet vs RoundtableDebate, brainstorm and consensus discussions with a council summary and MCP, $59 a month.→Bordet vs Council AIUp to 24 models and a moderator verdict with an agreement score, $19.99 to $99.99 a month.→Bordet vs PoeAbout a hundred models and bots in separate chats, on compute points.→Bordet vs MultipleChatOne prompt to several models, answers side by side, team plans for shared projects.→
The short version
- A council answers a question. Bordet runs your project. The same models sit at a standing table and read each other across sessions.
- One memory, every model. Claude knows what you told GPT on Tuesday. Your co-founder sees the same board. The decisions log is the same for everyone.
- Your own AI at the table. claude.ai, ChatGPT, Claude Code and Cursor connect as seats: your subscription does the thinking, the table remembers.
- Pay per turn, or nothing above the labs' prices. $2 free, credits from $5, or bring your own keys. Per-room spend caps.